Apple Inc.
SPS Core Analysis Metrics
#834/1000
OVERALL SCORETeam Consensus
5-Factor Analysis
Target Price (Avg)
$205.50
+10.8%
SPS Price Scenarios (12M)
SPS Risk Assessment
SPS Ratings
12-Month Price Performance
Key Metrics
Wall Street Consensus
$198.30 -7%
Quick Metrics
SPS Quantitative Framework
Structured rule-based evaluations derived from sector, industry and peer benchmarks.
Multi-Level Comparison
AAPL Key Fundamentals
Assessed vs sector & direct peers
Top Sector PeersSelected from SPS Global Ranking Technology Sector GICS Sector Classification |
Apple
AAPL • #34
|
Microsoft
MSFT • #18
|
Alphabet
GOOGL • #57
|
Meta
META • #72
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPS Score (out of 1,000) |
834
|
874
|
642
|
538
|
| Target Price |
10.8%
$205.50
|
8.0%
$585.00
|
12.5%
$195.00
|
15.2%
$720.00
|
| Financial Health | Fair | Good | Excellent | Good |
| Profitability | Good | Excellent | Good | Excellent |
| Growth (Revenue) | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | Fair |
| Valuation | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair |
| Potentials | Fair | Good | Good | Fair |
| Market Sentiment | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
| Management Effectiveness | Very Good | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Overall Assessment | EXCELLENT | EXCELLENT | GOOD | FAIR |
SPS Quantitative Summary
Based on SPS Key Metrics and Pillars
Apple ranks #34 out of 5,000+ stocks analyzed by SPS. Within its Technology peer group, the stock currently ranks 2nd, sitting just behind Microsoft.
Overall, SPS models classify Apple as a fundamentally strong equity with low-to-medium risk characteristics.
Upside potential appears moderate at current levels, suggesting limited return expectations relative to top-ranked peers.
Market Dynamics and Looking-Forward Estimates
Historical trends and forward-looking projections based on SPS data processing, integrated into SPS Scoring
Volatility Evolution
Percentage (%)
Trading Volume Evolution
M Shares
News Sentiment Evolution
Lookback periods, reflected in Market Sentiment pillar.
Earnings Per Share Estimations
Actual vs Estimate ($)
Revenue Estimations
Actual vs Estimate ($B)
SPS Enhanced Opportunity Dashboard
Discover and compare investment opportunities using SPS quantitative intelligence
Explore Rankings
Compare leading stocks using different SPS ranking criteria
SBUX
+68%
TSLA
+93%
DIS
+62%
Preview - Illustrative Example
Custom Screener
Adjust signals. Rebuild rankings. Surface your own high-conviction setups.
Preview - Illustrative Example
Refine Opportunities with Custom Filters
Build your own ranking logic using institutional-grade metrics.
Top Opportunities
| # | Asset | Signal | SPS | Gains |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 |
NVDA
|
Strong Buy | 940 | +67.2% |
| 02 |
META
|
Strong Buy | 912 | +52.4% |
| 03 |
GOOGL
|
Buy | 895 | +48.1% |
| 04 |
AAPL
|
Buy | 878 | +45.9% |
| 05 |
MSFT
|
Buy | 866 | +41.3% |
Piotroski F-Score
9-point fundamental strength assessment based on profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency
About the Piotroski F-Score
Developed by Joseph Piotroski (2000), this value investing framework assigns 1 point for each of 9 binary criteria across profitability, leverage/liquidity, and operating efficiency. 0–3 → Weak, 4–6 → Moderate, 7–8 → Strong, 9 → Exceptional.
7.4
Below elite stock benchmark
5.2
Apple scores above market average
5.8
Slightly above sector peers
The company demonstrates moderate fundamental strength, supported by solid core operations with some areas still showing room for improvement. Profitability remains solid, supported by positive earnings and operating cash flow generation. Balance sheet trends are improving, supported by healthier liquidity and reduced financial leverage. Operating efficiency remains stable, though some productivity metrics softened year-over-year.
Positive net income confirms baseline profitability.
Assets are generating positive returns.
Operations are not generating positive cash flow.
Operating cash flow exceeds reported net income.
Liquidity improved year-over-year.
Long-term debt increased.
Material share dilution detected.
Gross margin expanded year-over-year.
Asset utilization weakened.
Technical Analysis
Multi-timeframe momentum, trend strength, volatility and divergence indicators
RSI (Relative Strength Index)
14-day • Overbought/Oversold Momentum
Short (7d)
89.9
2/5Med (14d)
67.5
5/5Long (28d)
65.3
5/5MACD (Momentum Divergence)
Histogram & Signal Line
EMA (Trend Structure)
20/50/200 • Price vs Moving Averages
All 3 EMAs
Price Above
Structure
Bullish Stack
Scores
5/5 All
ADX (Trend Strength)
14-day • Average Directional Index
29.7
Moderate Trend Strength
Short (7d)
39.1
4/5Med (14d)
29.7
5/5Long (28d)
24.1
5/5Bollinger Bands
20,2 • %B Position & Band Width
%B Position (where price sits in band range)
Upper Band
$278.74
Lower Band
$260.41
All Timeframes
5/5 ScorePosition
Upper Band
Signal
Strong
ATR (Volatility)
14-day • Average True Range
6.07
ATR% = 2.6% (Normal Volatility)
Short (14)
5.07
4/5Med (21)
6.07
4/5Long (50)
5.07
4/5Technical Essentials Support (Derived Metrics)
MACD Histogram
+2.14
Bullish DivergenceMACD%
0.12%
MACD / Close PriceHistogram%
0.011%
ExpandingEMA Gap%
+3.2%
Above EMA 200Trend Direction
Uptrend
Strengthening%B Position
0.78
Near Upper BandATR%
2.6%
Normal VolPrice vs MACD
Aligned
No DivergenceMulti-Timeframe Technical Summary
Medium and long-term signals remain constructive with average scores of 5/5. RSI shows short-term overbought at 89.95, suggesting potential pullback risk. MACD histogram expanding bullishly across all timeframes. Price above all major EMAs confirms strong trend structure. ADX at 29.7 indicates moderate trend strength with room for acceleration. Bollinger %B at 0.78 shows price near upper band with normal volatility (ATR 2.6%). No divergence detected between price and momentum indicators.
Fundamental Metrics Explorer
Industry-benchmarked calculated metrics across profitability, valuation, and financial health
Data Methodology
All metrics are calculated from raw financial statements, benchmarked against sector and industry averages for comparative analysis.
Raw Financial Statements Explorer
Key Line Items with Trend Analysis & 5-Year Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
Data Methodology
Annual values represent rolling 4-quarter averages (not fiscal year-end) to minimize seasonal distortions and provide smoother trend analysis.